UNITED STATES v. MANSION HOUSE CENTER REDEVELOPMENT CO.

No. 85-2481.

796 F.2d 1039 (1986)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. MANSION HOUSE CENTER REDEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a limited partnership, and MH Center Tower Redevelopment Corporation, a corporation, and Norman S. Altman, E.J. Ehrlich, Pierre V. Heftler and Hart Perry, General Partners of Mansion House Center Redevelopment Company, a limited partnership, and Mansion House Center Redevelopment Corporation, a corporation, and Maurice B. Frank, General Partners of Mansion House Center Redevelopment Company, a limited partnership, Appellants. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. MANSION HOUSE CENTER NORTH REDEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a limited partnership; MH Center North Tower Redevelopment Corporation, a corporation, and Norman S. Altman, E.J. Ehrlich, Pierre V. Heftler, Hart Perry, General partners of Mansion House Center North Redevelopment Co., a limited partnership; Mansion House Center North Redevelopment Corporation, a corporation, and Frank, Maurice B., General Partners of Mansion House Center North Redevelopment Co., a limited partnership, Appellants. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. MANSION HOUSE CENTER SOUTH REDEVELOPMENT COMPANY, et al and Mansion House Center South Tower Redevelopment Corporation, a corporation, and Norman S. Altman, E.J. Ehrlich, Pierre V. Heftler and Hart Perry, General Partners of Mansion House Center South Redevelopment Co., a limited partnership, and Mansion House Center South Redevelopment Corporation, a corporation, and Maurice B. Frank, General Partners of Mansion House Center South Redevelopment Co., Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided July 17, 1986.

Rehearing Denied August 18, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Alan Seigel, St. Louis, Mo., for appellants.

J. Christopher Kohn, James G. Bruen, Jr., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before ROSS, McMILLIAN and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.


ROSS, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal we are asked to determine whether the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) acted within its contractual rights when it declared the settlement agreement between itself and the owners of the Mansion House Center (Owner-Partnerships) null and void. The district court held that HUD had acted within its contractual rights. 607 F.Supp. 392...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases