Per Curiam.
Appellant attacks the validity of the writ of prohibition issued by the court of appeals on several grounds. Appellant first asserts that the appellate court is without the authority to remove a common pleas court judge from a pending case on the basis of an alleged bias or prejudice.
This argument has become moot since the court of appeals vacated that portion of its order removing appellant from hearing the contempt proceeding on April...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
