HARRY SKOLNICK & SONS v. HEYMAN

(3787)

7 Conn. App. 175 (1986)

HARRY SKOLNICK AND SONS v. SAMUEL J. HEYMAN

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decision released April 22, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey D. Ginzberg, with whom, on the brief, was Arnold M. Potash, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Austin K. Wolf, with whom were Stewart I. Edelstein and, on the brief, Daniel S. Nagel, for the appellee (defendant).

DUPONT, C. J., BORDEN and BIELUCH, JS.


BORDEN, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his application to confirm what he claimed to be two arbitration awards. The plaintiff is a contractor which constructed two shopping centers for the defendant. The dispositive issue is whether the identical provision in the two construction contracts between the parties requiring the submission of certain disputes over payment for determination by the projects' architect is an agreement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases