1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 181 Cal.App.3d
  5. 181 Cal.App.3d 1 (1986)
 

HILL v. BINGHAM

Docket No. B011912.

181 Cal.App.3d 1 (1986)

225 Cal. Rptr. 905

JOE HILL, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DUKE BINGHAM, JR., Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

May 15, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Todd & Siegel and John Sanford Todd for Defendant and Appellant.

Stump, Garner & Wright and James L. Wright for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

KLEIN, P.J.

Defendant and appellant Duke Bingham, Jr. (Bingham), appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and respondent Joe Hill (Hill).

The trial court erred in granting Hill's motion for reconsideration because Hill's failure to act diligently to bring the action to trial within five years precludes him from benefiting from any exceptions which otherwise would...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases