1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 624 F.Supp.
  5. 624 F.Supp. 1195 (1986)
 

FRIEDMAN v. ADAMS RUSSELL CABLE SERVICES-NEW YORK

No. 84 Civ. 8109 (PNL).

624 F.Supp. 1195 (1986)

Arthur FRIEDMAN, Plaintiff, v. ADAMS RUSSELL CABLE SERVICES-NEW YORK, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

January 15, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kassner & Haigney, New York City, for plaintiff.

Choate, Hall & Stewart, Boston, Mass., for defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

LEVAL, District Judge.

This is an action for damages and injunctive relief under the antitrust laws. The plaintiff, Arthur Friedman, alleges that the defendant, Adams Russell Cable Services, the holder of the cable television franchises in Harrison and Port Chester, New York, has abused its monopoly power by illegally tying together its provision of two levels of cable services. All material...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases