1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 784 F.2d
  5. 784 F.2d 1023 (1986)
 

BAYMA v. SMITH BARNEY, HARRIS UPHAM AND CO., INC.

No. 85-1506.

784 F.2d 1023 (1986)

William BAYMA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SMITH BARNEY, HARRIS UPHAM AND COMPANY, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided March 14, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael P. Carbone, Jordan, Lawrence, Dawson & Carbone, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Theodore A. Griffinger, Ira D. Goldberg, Martin Berglas, Griffinger, Levinson, Freed & Heinemann, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellants.

Before GOODWIN, ALARCON and POOLE, Circuit Judges.

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:

Smith Barney, Harris Upham and Co., Inc. brings this interlocutory appeal from an order denying a stay pending the compulsory arbitration called for in a contract of employment between Bayma, an account executive, and Smith Barney, a member firm of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).

At the time of Bayma's employment, he executed a form contract drafted by the NYSE for use by its member firms. The agreement included a standard arbitration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases