THOENNES v. THOENNES

D84-0165; CA A34955.

713 P.2d 1092 (1986)

77 Or.App. 695

In the matter of the Marriage of Charlotte THOENNES, Appellant — Cross-Respondent, and Edward J. Thoennes, Respondent — Cross-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 12, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick J. Furrer, Tigard, argued the cause for appellant — cross-respondent. With him on brief was Furrer & Scott, Tigard.

Douglas L. Minson, Hillsboro, argued the cause and filed the brief, for respondent — cross-appellant.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and ROSSMAN, J.


ROSSMAN, Judge.

Wife appeals from a dissolution decree, claiming that the trial court awarded husband an excessive portion of the property.1 Husband cross-appeals, claiming that the trial court failed to take into consideration monthly benefits of $343 that wife will receive from his retirement program. We review de novo and conclude that the decree must be modified to correct an apparent mistake in the computation of an appropriate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases