STATE v. SCHNIPPER

No. 85-23.

22 Ohio St. 3d 158 (1986)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. SCHNIPPER, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 19, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lee C. Falke, prosecuting attorney, and Walter F. Ruf, for appellee.

Denny, Malloy & Cox and Steven M. Cox, for appellant.


Per Curiam.

Appellant's motion for leave to appeal was granted on the limited issue of whether the trial court's failure to conduct an in camera inspection of the police report, prior to prohibiting its use in the cross-examination of Officer Hensley, was in contravention of Crim. R. 16(B). Crim. R. 16(B)(1) provides, in relevant part:

"(g) In camera inspection of witness' statement. Upon completion of a witness' direct examination at...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases