CABAL v. DONNELLY

No. 20-803; CA A33370.

714 P.2d 1071 (1986)

78 Or.App. 56

Robert C. CABAL and Julie A. Cabal, Husband and Wife, Appellants-Cross-Respondents, v. William G. DONNELLY, Dba Donnelly and Jenner Construction, Defendant, Herbert D. Jenner, Dba Donnelly and Jenner Construction, Respondent-Cross-Appellant,

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 26, 1986.

Reconsideration Denied April 11, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald M. Kelley, Silverton, argued the cause for appellants-cross-respondents. With him on briefs was Kelley & Kelley, Silverton.

J. Michael Alexander, Salem, argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant. With him on brief was Burt, Swanson, Lathen, Alexander & McCann, Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.


BUTTLER, Presiding Judge.

This case requires that we decide the apparently unresolved question whether an action against a builder-vendor to recover damages under the implied warranty that the new residence has been built in a workmanlike manner and was fit for habitation sounds in tort or contract. See Yepsen v. Burgess, 269 Or. 635, 525 P.2d 1019 (1974); Schmauch v. Johnston, 274 Or. 441, 547 P.2d 119...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases