1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 789 F.2d
  5. 789 F.2d 991 (1986)
 

PANAMA PROCESSES, S.A. v. CITIES SERVICE CO.

No. 126, Docket 85-7374.

789 F.2d 991 (1986)

PANAMA PROCESSES, S.A., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITIES SERVICE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided May 5, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert I. Edelman, New York City (Martin G. Bunin, Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

James C. Blair, Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton, New York City, of counsel, for defendant-appellee.

Before: CARDAMONE, PIERCE, and MINER, Circuit Judges.

PIERCE, Circuit Judge:

This case presents the issue of whether a district court may amend a consent order and judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(a) after it has been affirmed on appeal. Because we hold that the court (Charles S. Haight, Judge) had jurisdiction to grant appellee's Rule 60(a) motion under this court's ruling in Marc Rich & Co., A.G. v. United States, 739 F.2d 834 (2d Cir.1984), we affirm. Familiarity...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases