1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 723 P.2d
  5. 723 P.2d 1034 (1986)
 

1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON v. WASCO CO. COURT

81-132; CA A39509.

723 P.2d 1034 (1986)

80 Or. App. 532

1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON, the assumed name of Oregon Land Use Project, Inc., an Oregon non-profit Corporation, Kelly McGreer, Rosemary McGreer, James G. Perkins, Shirlee Perkins, David Dickson and Melinda Dickson, Petitioners-Cross-Respondents, v. WASCO COUNTY COURT, David Knapp, Kent Bullock, Samadhi Matthews, Respondents, City of Rajneeshpuram and Rajneesh Foundation International, formerly Chidvalis Rajneesh Meditation Center, Respondents-Cross-Petitioners.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 6, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth M. Novack, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners-cross-respondents. With him on the brief were Ball, Janik and Novack, Mark J. Greenfield and Robert E. Stacey, Jr., Portland.

Leslie M. Roberts, Portland, argued the cause for respondents David Knapp, Richard Dennis Smith, Kent Bullick and Samadhi Matthews, and respondents-cross-petitioners City of Rajneeshpuram and Rajneesh Foundation International, formerly Chidvalis Rajneesh Meditation Center. With her on the brief were Sullivan, Josselson, Roberts, Johnson & Kloos and Rex Armstrong, Portland.

No appearance for respondent Wasco County.

Before WARDEN, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.

WARDEN, Presiding Judge.

Petitioners seek review of an order in which the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) held that certain undisclosed business dealings between Wasco County Judge Richard Cantrell1 and those seeking to incorporate the City of Rajneeshpuram did not invalidate Cantrell's vote in favor of holding an election on a petition to incorporate the city. We reverse and remand.

This case is a companion to 1000 Friends...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases