1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 723 P.2d
  5. 723 P.2d 1021 (1986)
 

APALATEGUI v. WASHINGTON CTY.

LUBA 85-043, 85-044, & 85-045; CA A39012.

723 P.2d 1021 (1986)

80 Or. App. 508

Joe and Betty APALATEGUI, Gary La Haie, and Greg and Mary Jo Brown, Linda Peters, Dallas and Jim Fink, Mark and Lucinda Freidman, Vicki Taylor, Robert King, Mary and Garrold Williams, Barbara Buehler, Joan Brown, Fritz Buehler, and the Dairy Creek Valley Assn., Inc., an Oregon Non-profit Corporation, Petitioners-Cross-Respondents, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner. Gary La HAIE, Joe and Betty Apalategui, Greg and Mary Jo Brown, Linda Peters, Dallas and Jim Fink, Mark and Lucinda Freidman, Vicki Taylor, Robert King, Mary and Garrold Williams, Barbara Buehler, Joan Brown, Fritz Buehler, and the Dairy Creek Valley Assn., Inc., an Oregon Non-profit Corporation, Petitioners-Cross-Respondents, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner. Greg and Mary Jo BROWN, Joe and Betty Apalategui, Gary La Haie, Linda Peters, Dallas and Jim Fink, Mark and Lucinda Freidman, Vicki Taylor, Robert King, Mary Buehler, Joan Brown, Fritz Buehler, and the Dairy Creek Valley Assn., Inc., an Oregon Non-profit Corporation, Petitioners-Cross-Respondents, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 6, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward J. Sullivan, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners-cross-respondents. With him on the briefs was Sullivan, Josselson, Roberts, Johnson & Kloos, Portland.

Alan S. Bachman, Chief Asst. County Counsel, Hillsboro, argued the cause for respondent-cross-petitioner. With him on the brief was John M. Junkin, County Counsel, Hillsboro.

Before WARDEN, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.

WARDEN, Presiding Judge.

Petitioners in these consolidated cases seek review of an order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) which rejected some of their challenges to three Washington County ordinances. The ordinances amended the county's comprehensive plan, community development (zoning) code (CDC) and comprehensive plan maps. The county cross-petitions, seeking review of LUBA's action in sustaining some of petitioners' other challenges. We affirm on the petitions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases