STATE v. BAKST

No. C-850316.

30 Ohio App. 3d 141 (1986)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. BAKST, APPELLANT.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Hamilton County.

Decided February 19, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Castellini, city solicitor, Paul J. Gorman, city prosecutor, and Rodney Prince, for appellee.

O'Connor, Acciani & Assoc. and Michael P. O'Connor, for appellant.


BLACK, J.

Defendant-appellant Sanford Bakst ("defendant") was convicted in a jury trial of operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, in violation of R.C. 4511.19(A)(1). On appeal, he contends in six assignments of error that the trial court erred in the following actions: (1) the overruling of his motion to suppress evidence, because the arresting officer had no probable cause; (2) the admission of "highly prejudicial and totally irrelevant statements...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases