STATE v. BALL

C83-07-33480; C84-12-35437; CA A36004 (Control); CA A36005.

711 P.2d 988 (1986)

77 Or.App. 308

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Ronald Lee BALL, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 22, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John P. Daugirda, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen. and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

In this criminal case, defendant appeals three convictions for possession of a controlled substance and the revocation of a separate probation he was serving. As the state concedes, defendant's convictions must be reversed and remanded for trial under State v. Westlund, 75 Or.App. 43, 705 P.2d 208, rev. allowed 300 Or. 332, 710 P.2d 146 (1985).1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases