1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 187 Cal.App.3d
  5. 187 Cal.App.3d 1510 (1986)
 

OLIVER MACHINERY v. UNITED STATES FID. & GUAR.

Docket No. B017000.

187 Cal.App.3d 1510 (1986)

232 Cal. Rptr. 691

OLIVER MACHINERY COMPANY, Cross-complainant and Appellant, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, Cross-defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

December 18, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Kilpatrick, Clayton, Meyer & Madden, Donald W. Meyer and Scott M. Koppel for Cross-complainant and Appellant.

Norby & Brodeur and Paul D. Loreto for Cross-defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

JOHNSON, J.

On cross-motions for summary judgment or adjudication of issues, the trial court determined as a matter of law United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (USF&G) has no duty to defend or indemnify Oliver Machinery Company (Oliver) in the underlying action under a vendor's broad form endorsement contained in a policy issued to Pal Industries, Inc. (Pal).

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases