STATE v. RAHMAN

No. 84-1961.

23 Ohio St. 3d 146 (1986)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. RAHMAN, A.K.A. SMILEY, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 30, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Allen, prosecuting attorney, and Jerry E. Ault, for appellee.

Randall M. Dana, public defender, and S. Adele Shank, for appellant.


I

CELEBREZZE, C.J.

Appellant first contends that, pursuant to R.C. 2945.42,1 his wife was not competent to testify against him at trial. Appellant further argues that allowing his wife to testify concerning privileged marital communications was substantial, prejudicial error in contravention of R.C. 2945.42. Although we reject the first of these contentions, we find merit in the second.

The Rules of Evidence which now...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases