WILSON v. BRISTOL-MYERS CO.


118 A.D.2d 50 (1986)

Carole C. Wilson, Respondent-Appellant, v. Bristol-Myers Company et al., Appellants-Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 5, 1986


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth A. Plevan of counsel (Peter S. Julian with him on the brief; Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, attorneys), for appellants-respondents.

Robert E. Isner of counsel (William R. Hansen with him on the brief; Nims, Howes, Collison & Isner, attorneys), for respondent-appellant.

SULLIVAN, J. P., LYNCH, MILONAS and ROSENBERGER, JJ., concur.


ROSS, J.

Defendants Bristol-Myers Company (Bristol-Myers) and Clairol Incorporated (Clairol), appeal from so much of Special Term's order as denied their summary judgment motion to dismiss the first, third and fifth causes of action of the complaint, which allege unjust enrichment, negligence in the failure to prosecute a patent application, and breach of implied contract, and breach of fiduciary duty, respectively...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases