1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 184 Cal.App.3d
  5. 184 Cal.App.3d 1491 (1986)
 

FRAZIER v. CITY OF RICHMOND

Docket No. A032128.

184 Cal.App.3d 1491 (1986)

228 Cal. Rptr. 376

MARVIN G. FRAZIER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF RICHMOND et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

July 22, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Duane W. Reno, Davis & Reno and Davis, Reno & Courtney for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Malcolm Hunter, City Attorney, and Wayne S. Nishioka, Assistant City Attorney, for Defendants and Appellants.

OPINION

MERRILL, J.

In this class action on behalf of all current and retired police officers and firefighters of the City of Richmond and their successors in interest/beneficiaries who are members of a pension plan set forth in article XI of the City of Richmond Charter, the trial court determined (1) that the "salary" used to compute retirement allowances under article XI should include the holiday pay and uniform allowances provided...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases