1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 805 F.2d
  5. 805 F.2d 866 (1986)
 

BARRY v. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA

No. 85-6448.

805 F.2d 866 (1986)

Dr. Donald J. BARRY and Dr. Bert Hassler, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided December 4, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Don Erik Franzen, Beverly Hills, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.

James Martin, Oakland, Cal., for defendant-appellee.

Before WALLACE, BOOCHEVER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

Barry and Hassler, two California physicians, appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of Blue Cross of California (Blue Cross). Their complaint alleges that Blue Cross participated in price-fixing and a group boycott in violation of federal antitrust law. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

I

Blue Cross, a nonprofit corporation, offers various forms of medical insurance to residents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases