1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 780 F.2d
  5. 780 F.2d 883 (1986)
 

UNITED STATES v. PATERSON

No. 85-1247.

780 F.2d 883 (1986)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Lynch PATERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

January 3, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Thomas Coghill and David J. Richman of Coghill & Goodspeed, P.C., Denver, Colo., for defendant-appellant.

William L. Lutz, U.S. Atty., and David N. Williams, Asst. U.S. Atty., Albuquerque, N.M., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before BARRETT, SETH and McKAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This matter is before the court on defendant-appellant's application for bail pending appeal.

We have carefully examined the record and the papers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases