NASR v. CONNECTICUT GEN. LIFE INS. CO.

No. 85 C 1830.

632 F.Supp. 1024 (1986)

Mohamed NASR, Plaintiff, v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and Shaklee Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

March 10, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Quinn, Churchill, Baumgartner & Phillips, Ltd., Grayslake, Ill., for plaintiff.

Richard J. Jacobson, James T. Otis and Weston W. Hanscom, Keck, Mahin & Cate, Chicago, Ill., for Connecticut General Life Ins. Co.

Donald A. Mackay and Stephen C. Carlson, Sidley & Austin, Chicago, Ill., for Shaklee Corp.


ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Mohamed Nasr, a physician, has filed a two-count complaint against defendants Connecticut General Life Insurance Company ("Connecticut General") and Shaklee Corporation ("Shaklee") for defamation and interference with prospective advantage and for interference with prospective advantage respectively. Shaklee has answered the complaint. Connecticut General moves to dismiss both counts for failure to state a claim upon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases