1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 25 Ohio
  5. 25 Ohio St. 3d 137 (1986)
 

CINCINNATI v. BUDGET COMM. OF HAMILTON CTY.

Nos. 85-1443 and 85-1467.

25 Ohio St. 3d 137 (1986)

CITY OF CINCINNATI, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. BUDGET COMMISSION OF HAMILTON COUNTY; HAMILTON COUNTY ET AL., APPELLANTS AND CROSS-APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 23, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Castellini, city solicitor, and Nancy H. Simmons, for appellee and cross-appellant city of Cincinnati.

Arthur M. Ney, Jr., prosecuting attorney, and Thomas J. Scheve, for appellant and cross-appellee Hamilton County.

Wood & Lamping and Robert P. Malloy, assistant city solicitor, for appellant and cross-appellee city of Springdale.

Robert G. Kelly, for appellant and cross-appellee city of Norwood.

Per Curiam.

The questions before this court concern whether each of the decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals relative to local subdivisions is arbitrary, unreasonable, or contrary to law, under the standards pronounced by this court in Bd. of Cty. Commrs. v. Budget Comm. (1946), 146 Ohio St. 636, 639-641 [33 O.O. 108], and Bd. of Cty. Commrs. v. Willoughby Hills (1968), 14 Ohio St.2d 163

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases