1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 795 F.2d
  5. 795 F.2d 787 (1986)
 

DOE v. MAHER

No. 84-2720.

795 F.2d 787 (1986)

John DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, Jack Smith, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant, v. Bill MAHER, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided July 28, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Toby Fishbein Rubin, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Asher Rubin, Deputy Atty. Gen., Thomas Berliner, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before SNEED, SCHROEDER and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs-appellants John Doe and Jack Smith appeal from the district court's denial of their motion for reconsideration of its order denying their motion for attorney's fees. We affirm.

I.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The facts of this case and the history of the proceedings below are summarized in our opinion in Doe v. Maher, 793 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir.1986). Only a few additional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases