CHITTENDEN SO. EDUC. v. HINESBURG SCH. DIST.

No. 85-411.

514 A.2d 1065 (1986)

CHITTENDEN SOUTH EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, HINESBURG UNIT v. HINESBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT; Hinesburg School Board, Rita Flynn Villa, Ruth Ayer, James Foster, Jean Kaidaisch and John O'Donnell.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

July 25, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James S. Suskin, Montpelier and Robert H. Chanin and Bruce R. Lerner of Bredhoff & Kaiser, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee.

Dennis W. Wells of Downs Rachlin & Martin, Burlington and Nicholas DiGiovanni, Jr. of Morgan, Brown & Joy, Boston, Mass., for defendants-appellants.

Before ALLEN, C.J., and HILL, PECK, GIBSON and HAYES, JJ.


GIBSON, Justice.

This is an appeal by the Hinesburg School District and the Hinesburg School Board (School Board) from a decision of the Vermont Labor Relations Board (VLRB) ordering the School Board to add certain provisions to their contract offer for the 1984-85 school year, and to reinstate striking teachers upon their unconditional application to return to work. The Chittenden South Education Association, Hinesburg...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases