1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 724 P.2d
  5. 724 P.2d 850 (1986)
 

GALLEGOS v. AMALGAMATED SUGAR CO.

WCB 83-02336; CA A36983.

724 P.2d 850 (1986)

81 Or. App. 68

In the Matter of the Compensation of Margaret Gallegos, A Beneficiary of Samuel Gallegos, Claimant (deceased). Margaret GALLEGOS, Petitioner, v. AMALGAMATED SUGAR COMPANY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 3, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tim J. Helfrich, Ontario, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Yturri, Rose, Burnham, Ebert & Bentz, Ontario.

Stephen B. Fonda, Nyssa, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Stunz, Fonda, Pratt, Nichols & Kiyuna, Nyssa.

Before WARDEN, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.

VAN HOOMISSEN, Judge.

Claimant seeks judicial review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board that affirmed and adopted the referee's order denying her claim for dependent's benefits. See ORS 656.005(11);1 ORS 656.204(5).2 We review de novo, ORS 656.298, and affirm.

The referee found:

"Margaret Gallegos is the claimant in this case. Her son, the injured worker, Samuel Gallegos...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases