MULLEN v. COUCH

No. 85-235.

703 S.W.2d 866 (1986)

288 Ark. 231

Kathy MULLEN, Appellant, v. Homer COUCH, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

February 18, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laser, Sharp & Mayes, Little Rock, for appellant.

Harold King, Little Rock, for appellee.


NEWBERN, Justice.

The question presented here is whether there is a limit on the time within which a court may grant a timely motion for a new trial. We hold that the trial court loses jurisdiction to rule on the motion ninety days after the judgment is filed with the clerk. Therefore, we reverse the court's granting of the new trial motion on July 1, 1985, with respect to a judgment filed February 4, 1985.

Ark.R.Civ.P. 59 is devoted to the subject of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases