1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 791 F.2d
  5. 791 F.2d 755 (1986)
 

MERCY-PENINSULA AMBULANCE v. SAN MATEO COUNTY

No. 85-1548.

791 F.2d 755 (1986)

MERCY-PENINSULA AMBULANCE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided June 10, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roderick G. Dorman, Dorman & Wheeler, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Michael Bradley, Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Beattie, San Francisco, Cal., Thomas Fellows, San Jose, Cal., William J. Meeske, Michael J. Shockro, Lathan & Watkins, Los Angeles, Cal., Rochelle D. Alpert, Michael F. Ram, Morrison & Foerster, San Francisco, Cal., James C. Martin, Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May, Oakland, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before CHOY, SKOPIL and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges.

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Mercy-Peninsula Ambulance brought this antitrust action against San Mateo County and various medical care providers. The appellant, Mercy, operates ambulances in the county and wishes to deliver paramedic services. It challenges the county's granting of exclusive contracts to others for such services. The principal issue that we must decide is whether the challenged conduct enjoys state action immunity under the antitrust laws....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases