1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 724 P.2d
  5. 724 P.2d 822 (1986)
 

BANISTER CONTINENTAL CORP. v. NORTHWEST PIPELINE CORP.

TC 81-6-745; CA A28212; SC S32416.

724 P.2d 822 (1986)

301 Or. 763

BANISTER CONTINENTAL CORPORATION, Respondent on Review, v. NORTHWEST PIPELINE CORPORATION, Petitioner on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided September 16, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James H. Clarke, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on petition was Spears, Lubersky, Campbell, Bledsoe, Anderson & Young.

Arden E. Shenker, Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on response to the petition for review were Elizabeth A. Trainor and Tooze, Marshall, Shenker, Holloway & Duden and Robert T. Mautz and Mautz & Hallman.

Before LENT, P.J., and LINDE, CAMPBELL, CARSON and JONES, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION.

Defendant appealed an adverse judgment in a contract dispute, raising 54 assignments of error. Plaintiff cross-appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed, Banister Continental Corp. v. NW Pipeline Corp., 76 Or.App. 282, 709 P.2d 1103 (1985). Both defendant and plaintiff petitioned for review. We allowed review.

After argument of this case, the parties reached a settlement agreement, filed a stipulation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases