STATE v. MATTILA

M 56583-B; CA A34261.

712 P.2d 832 (1986)

77 Or.App. 219

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Russell Erik MATTILA, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted June 19, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Gernant, Portland, argued the cause and filed brief for appellant.

Jonathan H. Fussner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Salem, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.


VAN HOOMISSEN, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction following a jury trial for obstructing governmental or judicial administration. ORS 162.235.1 He contends that the trial court erred in overruling his demurrer to the complaint, in denying his motions for judgment of acquittal, in denying his motion to suppress evidence and in instructing the jury. We affirm.

We summarize the evidence in the light most favorable to the state...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases