RUSSELL v. RUSSELL

No. CA 85-349.

717 S.W.2d 820 (1986)

19 Ark.App. 119

Arthur RUSSELL, Appellant, v. Helen RUSSELL, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division I.

October 22, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wootton, Glover, Sanders, Slagle, Parkerson & Hargraves by Richard L. Slagle, Hot Springs, for appellant.

Callahan, Crow, Bachelor, Lax & Newell by C. Burt Newell and George M. Callahan, Hot Springs, for appellee.


CLONINGER, Judge.

This is a divorce case in which the appellee was granted a divorce from the appellant. Appellant alleges four points for reversal: insufficient proof of grounds for divorce; inadequate corroboration of those grounds; error in awarding judgment for temporary alimony; and that the award of alimony was improper or, in any event, excessive. The question we will resolve on this appeal is whether the appellee's grounds for divorce were sufficiently corroborated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases