VAN FOSSEN v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BD.

No. 86-536.

788 F.2d 748 (1986)

John M. VAN FOSSEN, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 10, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter B. Broida, of Passman & Broida, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

David Kane, of Merit Systems Protection Bd., Washington, D.C., for respondent. With him on brief were Evangeline W. Swift, Gen. Counsel and Mary Jennings, Associate Gen. Counsel for Litigation.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and BISSELL, Circuit Judges.


DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner John M. Van Fossen appeals the refusal by the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB or Board), Docket No. PH075283A0109ADD, to award attorney fees incurred in his largely successful challenge of a removal action brought against him by his employer, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD or agency). We reverse and remand.

I.

The facts concerning petitioner's discharge (involving his outside work) can be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases