INTERNATIONAL TIN COUNCIL v. AMALGAMET INC.

No. 86 Civ. 6165 (GLG).

645 F.Supp. 879 (1986)

In the Matter of the Application of the INTERNATIONAL TIN COUNCIL, Petitioner, v. AMALGAMET INC., Respondent, For an Order Remanding This Action to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

October 20, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Latham & Watkins, New York City, for petitioner; Selvyn Seidel, Warren B. Elterman, John D. Shyer, of counsel.

Chadbourne & Parke, New York City, for respondent; Richard J. Ney, Thomas J. Hall, David A. Vicinanzo, of counsel.


OPINION

GOETTEL, District Judge:

The petitioner, International Tin Council ("ITC"), brought an action in state court seeking to stay arbitration proceedings commenced by the respondent, Amalgamet, Inc. ("Amalgamet"). ITC's grounds for relief in the state court were two-fold: first, that the parties never made a binding agreement to arbitrate, and, second, that ITC is in any event immune from legal proceedings under international law. Amalgamet then removed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases