CROWE v. DE GIOIA


102 N.J. 50 (1986)

505 A.2d 591

ROSE K. CROWE, A/K/A ROSE K. DE GIOIA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. SERGIO DE GIOIA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 12, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary N. Skoloff argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent (Skoloff and Wolfe, attorneys).

Anthony B. Vignuolo argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant (Borrus, Goldin, Foley, Vignuolo, Hyman, and Stahl, attorneys; Anthony B. Vignuolo, Martin S. Goldin, and Leslie Jeddis Lang, on the brief).


PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Long, reported at 203 N.J.Super. 22 (1985).

STEIN, Justice, concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I agree with the Court's disposition of all of the issues in this litigation, except for its affirmance of the Appellate Division's determination that the trial court was precluded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases