1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 187 Cal.App.3d
  5. 187 Cal.App.3d 1325 (1986)
 

CITY OF ANTIOCH v. CITY COUNCIL

Docket No. A032118.

187 Cal.App.3d 1325 (1986)

232 Cal. Rptr. 507

CITY OF ANTIOCH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG, Defendant and Respondent; A.D. SEENO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

December 16, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

William R. Galstan, City Attorney, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Charles J. Williams and Williams, Caploe & Robbins for Defendant and Respondent.

Robert J. Rossi for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

OPINION

KLINE, P.J. —

INTRODUCTION

The City of Antioch appeals from a judgment of the Contra Costa County Superior Court denying Antioch's petition for a writ of mandate to compel the Pittsburg City Council (City Council) to set aside its negative declaration and prepare an environmental impact report (EIR) for a proposed road and sewer construction project. Antioch contends that Pittsburg violated the California...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases