1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 9 Conn.
  5. 9 Conn. App. 141 (1986)
 

STATE v. TATE

(3598)

9 Conn. App. 141 (1986)

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. DONALD TATE

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decision released November 11, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin B. Krulewitz, for the appellant (defendant).

Bernadette Conway, deputy assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, was James G. Clark, deputy assistant state's attorney, for the appellee (state).

DUPONT, C. J., HULL and SPALLONE, JS.

SPALLONE, J.

The defendant is appealing following his conviction, after a trial by jury, of the crimes of burglary in the third degree, in violation of General Statutes § 53a-103, and larceny in the third degree, in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-119 and 53a-124. The defendant's sole claim of error is that the trial court failed to suppress the victim's identification testimony.

The jury could reasonably have found the following facts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases