In re George I. BENNY and Alexandra Benny, Debtors. (Four Cases)
Alexandra BENNY, Debtor-Appellant,
v.
John M. ENGLAND, Trustee; Chicago Title Insurance Company, Creditor, etc., et al., Appellees.
UNITED STATES of America, Intervenor-Appellant,
v.
John M. ENGLAND, Trustee, Chicago Title Insurance Company, Creditor, etc., et al., Appellees.
Keith M. LUNDIN, Mark B. McFeely, William L. Norton, George C. Paine, III, Hugh Robinson and Arthur N. Votolato, Jr., Bankruptcy Judges, Applicants for Intervention-Appellants,
v.
Alexandra BENNY, Debtor-Appellee.
UNITED STATES of America, Intervenor-Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
John M. ENGLAND, Trustee; Chicago Title Insurance Company, Creditor, etc., et al., Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted July 10, 1985.
Decided June 9, 1986.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Law Offices of John T. Hansen, John T. Hansen, Lewis C. Maldondo, San Francisco, Cal., for Benny.
Richard K. Willard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Joseph P. Russoniello, U.S. Atty., Paul Blankenstein, Appellate Litigation Counsel, Judith F. Ledbetter, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for U.S.
Steven R. Ross, Gen. Counsel to the Clerk, Charles Tiefer, Deputy Gen. Counsel to the Clerk, Michael L. Murray, Asst. Counsel to the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, D.C., for Speaker & Bipartisan Leadership Group of the House of Representatives.
Michael Davidson, Morgan J. Frankel, Office of Senate Legal Counsel, Washington, D.C., for U.S. Senate.
Laurence J. Kaiser, Kronish, Lieb, Shainswit, Weiner & Hellman, New York City, for Bankruptcy Judges.
Before: FERGUSON, NORRIS and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:
These cases involve appeals from a district court's order, 44 B.R. 581, upholding the constitutionality of sections 106 and 121 of the Bankruptcy Amendments and Federal Judgeship Act of 1984, Pub.L. No. 98-353, 98 Stat. 333 (the 1984 Act), and from an order denying intervention to a group of bankruptcy judges.
We dismiss appeals Nos. 84-2805 and 85-1517, challenging the constitutionality of the 1984 Act...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
