Judgment affirmed, with costs.
It appears that the use to which the plaintiff is putting the demised premises comports with the uses permitted under the terms of the lease. The trial court was thus correct in enjoining the landlord from interfering with that use. This is particularly so in view of the fact that the tenant's business was maintained on the premises for several years without objection by the landlord, which objection could well have been asserted at...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
