1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 716 S.W.2d
  5. 716 S.W.2d 777 (1986)
 

ULRICH v. STATE

No. CA CR 86-73.

716 S.W.2d 777 (1986)

19 Ark.App. 62

James ULRICH and Olivia Kandur, Appellants, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division II.

October 1, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Young & Finley by Dale W. Finley, Russellville, for appellants.

Steve Clark, Atty. Gen. by Mary Beth Sudduth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, for appellee.

CORBIN, Judge.

This case comes to us from the Yell County Circuit Court. Appellants, James Ulrich and Olivia Kandur, appeal their convictions for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. We reverse the trial court's decision.

Appellants raise the following seven points for reversal:

I. THE AFFIDAVIT FOR SEARCH WARRANT WAS DEFECTIVE IN THAT IT DID NOT REVEAL THE TIME WHEN THE OBSERVATIONS OF THE INFORMANT WERE MADE.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases