1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 718 S.W.2d
  5. 718 S.W.2d 766 (1986)
 

DIAMOND SHAMROCK CORP. v. WENDT

No. 13-85-148-CV.

718 S.W.2d 766 (1986)

DIAMOND SHAMROCK CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Dan WENDT and Medina Valley A.I. Laboratory, Incorporated, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi.

On Rehearing October 9, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger Townsend, Charles W. Hurd, III, Reagan M. Brown, Houston, Robert J. Hearon, Jr., Pamela Stanton Baron, G. Michael Lawrence, Graves, Dougherty, Hearon & Moody, Austin, Kathleen B. Burke, Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.

John O'Quinn, William Fred Hagans, O'Quinn & Hagans, Houston, Robert Summers, Thornton, Summers, Biechlin, Dunham & Brown, San Antonio, for appellees.

Before SEERDEN, UTTER and BENAVIDES, JJ.

OPINION

SEERDEN, Justice.

Appellant complains of the judgment against it in a suit over the death of Wendt's bull, named "Superman 1024," which was killed on the premises of appellee, Medina Valley A.I. Laboratory, (Medina), by application of an insecticide, Vapona, manufactured by Diamond Shamrock Corporation (Shamrock) and applied to the bull by employees of Medina. Pursuant to jury answers to special issues, the trial court entered judgment, jointly and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases