STATE v. WEIST

10-84-08687; CA A36625.

720 P.2d 755 (1986)

79 Or.App. 808

STATE of Oregon, Appellant, v. Michael Guy WEIST, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 11, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan H. Fussner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

David J. Phillips, Public Defender, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before WARDEN, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

The state appeals a Lane County Circuit Court order granting defendant's motion to suppress evidence. The issue is the same as that considered by this court in a companion case, State v. Weist, 79 Or.App. 435, 720 P.2d 753 (1986), in which defendant appealed a Linn County Circuit Court order denying an identical motion to suppress. The question is whether a search warrant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases