1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 718 P.2d
  5. 718 P.2d 725 (1986)
 

IN RE HARRINGTON

OSB 82-4; SC S31056.

718 P.2d 725 (1986)

301 Or. 18

In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Francis E. HARRINGTON, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided April 22, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas E. Cooney, Portland, argued the cause for the accused. With him on the brief was Cooney, Crew & Wihtol, Portland.

James S. Leigh, Portland, argued the cause for the Oregon State Bar. Also on the brief were Klarquist, Sparkman, et al, Portland, and Glenn H. Prohaska and Day, Prohaska, et al, Portland.

Before PETERSON, C.J., and LENT, LINDE, ROBERTS, CARSON and JONES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is a lawyer disciplinary proceeding instituted by the Oregon State Bar in January 1983 against Francis E. Harrington. The Bar charges the accused with six causes of complaint, alleging 15 violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility (Disciplinary Rules). Five of the six causes of complaint arise out of the accused's association with a Mr. and Mrs. Burgard. The last cause of complaint stems from an unrelated probate matter. All charges involve...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases