ROSS v. SPRINGFIELD SCH. DIST. NO. 19

FDAB 80-1; CA A29074; SC S31480.

716 P.2d 724 (1986)

300 Or. 507

Frank W. ROSS, Petitioner On Review, v. SPRINGFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 19, Respondent On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Reassigned January 31, 1986.

Decided February 11, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert D. Durham, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the petition was Kulongoski, Durham, Drummonds & Columbo, Portland.

John C. Volmert, Springfield, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the response was Wurtz, Logan & Logan, Springfield.

James M. Campbell, Eugene, filed a brief amici curiae and memorandum amicorum curiae for Gay and Lesbian Alliance of the University of Oregon and Eugene Chapter of Nat. Lawyers Guild, Eugene. With him on the brief and memorandum was Goldstein & Campbell, Eugene.

Edward C. Harms, Jr., Springfield, filed a brief amicus curiae for Oregon School Boards Ass'n.


LINDE, Justice.

This case is before the court for the second time. In Ross v. Springfield School Dist. No. 19, 294 Or. 357, 657 P.2d 188 (1982), we reversed an order of the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board sustaining the respondent school district's dismissal of petitioner, a school teacher, which was partly based on grounds of immorality in the form of sexual conduct in a booth in a self-styled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases