SALDANA v. I.N.S.

Nos. 84-7118, 84-7549.

785 F.2d 650 (1986)

Herman SALDANA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed March 28, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Heriberto Gonzales, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.

Dzintra Janavs, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.

Before GOODWIN, FLETCHER and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

On page 826 of 762 F.2d, under A. Standard of Review delete the following:

Motions to reopen and motions to reconsider are not substitutes for hearings. The function of the BIA in dealing with these motions is not to determine whether the alien is eligible for relief under section 1254(a)(1). Rather, the BIA merely must determine whether the alien has set forth a prima facie showing that the deportation will result in extreme hardship. See...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases