1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 182 Cal.App.3d
  5. 182 Cal.App.3d 1230 (1986)
 

PEOPLE v. NADEAU

Docket No. 22709.

182 Cal.App.3d 1230 (1986)

227 Cal. Rptr. 644

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROBERT NEAL NADEAU, Defendant and Appellant. [And five other cases.]

Court of Appeals of California, Appellate Department, Superior Court, Los Angeles.

April 15, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Brown, Weston & Sarno and Robert Sarno for Defendants and Appellants.

Ira Reiner, District Attorney, Donald J. Kaplan and Dirk L. Hudson, Deputy District Attorneys, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

SOVEN, J.

In these cases, defendants were convicted of violating either Business and Professions Code section 16240 (operating a business without a license) or Los Angeles County Code section 7.140.020, subdivision B (engaging in a business with a revoked license). After defendants' demurrers to the complaints were overruled, each defendant submitted the matter on facts as stipulated by the parties, was found guilty as charged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases