PER CURIAM.
This appeal concerns a marriage of twenty-nine years. The parties had three children, all of whom have reached majority. We find no error in the trial court's distribution of the parties' assets. However, we conclude that the trial court should have awarded appellant permanent periodic alimony rather than rehabilitative alimony for a period of three years. Appellant did not work during most of the marriage. She
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.