KNOX v. CRIDDLE

84-1152.

490 So.2d 913 (1986)

Allen L. KNOX v. Albert E. CRIDDLE and Lucille R. Criddle.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 16, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Robert Faulk, Prattville, for appellant.

James W. Cameron and R. Howell Dean, Montgomery, for appellees.


PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment in a statutory ejectment action in which "a disputed boundary line" was suggested by Defendant. Because the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded, due to the failure of the judgment to order the sheriff to establish and mark the true line, no purpose will be served in detailing the facts or discussing at length the issue.

Suffice it to say that the record reveals a disputed factual issue as to the true...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases