MATTER OF MARRIAGE OF COPENHAVER AND COPENHAVER

81 608; CA A36105.

713 P.2d 685 (1986)

77 Or.App. 504

In the matter of the Marriage of Kathleen Joan COPENHAVER, Appellant, AND John McCall Copenhaver, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 29, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David W. Hittle, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Callahan, Hittle & Gardner, Salem.

Jack L. Kennedy, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Kennedy, King & Zimmer, Portland.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and GILLETTE, J.


PER CURIAM.

This dissolution case is before us again following our remand to consider the effect of Or. Laws 1983, ch. 766, on the financial circumstances of husband, who is a circuit court judge. 69 Or.App. 333, 687 P.2d 1086 (1984). We are now satisfied that the value of husband's retirement benefits was properly considered as part of the marital assets in the trial court's making an approximately...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases