HOARD v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION

85-AB-627; CA A36086.

717 P.2d 664 (1986)

79 Or.App. 62

David HOARD, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Raymond P. Thorne, Administrator, and Gelco Pony Express, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 23, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael H. Marcus, Legal Aid Service, Portland, argued the cause and filed brief for petitioner.

Michael D. Reynolds, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, waived appearance for respondent Employment Div.

Richard C. Hunt, Francis T. Barnwell, and Spears, Lubersky, Campbell, Bledsoe, Anderson & Young, Portland, filed brief for respondent Gelco Pony Exp.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and WARDEN and WARREN, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

This case is before us a second time on review of the Employment Appeals Board, which has twice affirmed a referee's order denying unemployment compensation benefits to petitioner, who was discharged because he was involved in a traffic accident while driving his employer's vehicle. The issue is whether he was discharged for misconduct connected with his work.

In the first review, Hoard v. Employment Division,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases