1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 645 F.Supp.
  5. 645 F.Supp. 725 (1986)
 

CAMACHO v. UNITED STATES

No. 86 M 81.

645 F.Supp. 725 (1986)

Amparo CAMACHO, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, United States Drug Enforcement Administration, Special Agent Joseph Reynolds, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

October 3, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Murray & Skoff, New York City by Abraham Y. Skoff, for plaintiff.

Reena Raggi, U.S. Atty., E.D.N.Y., Charles E. Knapp, Asst. U.S. Atty., for defendants.

McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

This is a motion pursuant to Rule 41(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure for the return of currency that plaintiff claims was unlawfully seized by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). The Government contends that Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e) does not invest the Court with subject matter jurisdiction over this case, and that petitioner has waived her right to a judicial determination because she failed to assert a proper claim to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases