1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 713 P.2d
  5. 713 P.2d 655 (1986)
 

GODFREY v. BICK & MONTE

16-84-00181; CA A34607.

713 P.2d 655 (1986)

77 Or.App. 429

Robert L. GODFREY, Appellant, v. BICK & MONTE, P.C., and Gregor, Hogan, McCracken & Early, P.C., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 29, 1986.

Reconsideration Denied April 11, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel C. Re, Bend, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Gray, Francher, Holmes & Hurley, Bend.

Brian D. Stine, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent Bick & Monte, P.C. With him on the brief were Darst B. Atherly and Atherly, Butler & Burgott, Eugene.

James M. Callahan, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Gregor, Hogan, McCracken & Early, P.C. With him on the brief was Bittner & Barker, P.C., Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and WARDEN and NEWMAN, JJ.

WARDEN, Judge.

This is a professional malpractice action. Plaintiff appeals the granting of defendants' motions for summary judgment on the ground that the complaint was not filed within the applicable Statute of Limitations. The trial court was correct and we affirm.

In the underlying corporate stock transaction structured by defendant attorneys and certified public accountants, plaintiff claims that he incurred additional federal and state income tax liability...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases